Dynamic

UDP vs QUIC

Developers should learn and use UDP when building applications that require low latency and can tolerate some data loss, such as real-time communication systems (e meets developers should learn quic when building high-performance web applications, especially those requiring low-latency connections like video streaming, online gaming, or real-time communication services. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

UDP

Developers should learn and use UDP when building applications that require low latency and can tolerate some data loss, such as real-time communication systems (e

UDP

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use UDP when building applications that require low latency and can tolerate some data loss, such as real-time communication systems (e

Pros

  • +g
  • +Related to: tcp, networking

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

QUIC

Developers should learn QUIC when building high-performance web applications, especially those requiring low-latency connections like video streaming, online gaming, or real-time communication services

Pros

  • +It's particularly useful for optimizing mobile and unreliable network environments, as it reduces connection setup time and handles packet loss more efficiently than traditional TCP/TLS stacks
  • +Related to: http-3, tls-1-3

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. UDP is a concept while QUIC is a protocol. We picked UDP based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
UDP wins

Based on overall popularity. UDP is more widely used, but QUIC excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev