UDP vs QUIC
Developers should learn and use UDP when building applications that require low latency and can tolerate some data loss, such as real-time communication systems (e meets developers should learn quic when building high-performance web applications, especially those requiring low-latency connections like video streaming, online gaming, or real-time communication services. Here's our take.
UDP
Developers should learn and use UDP when building applications that require low latency and can tolerate some data loss, such as real-time communication systems (e
UDP
Nice PickDevelopers should learn and use UDP when building applications that require low latency and can tolerate some data loss, such as real-time communication systems (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: tcp, networking
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
QUIC
Developers should learn QUIC when building high-performance web applications, especially those requiring low-latency connections like video streaming, online gaming, or real-time communication services
Pros
- +It's particularly useful for optimizing mobile and unreliable network environments, as it reduces connection setup time and handles packet loss more efficiently than traditional TCP/TLS stacks
- +Related to: http-3, tls-1-3
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. UDP is a concept while QUIC is a protocol. We picked UDP based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. UDP is more widely used, but QUIC excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev