Dynamic

UDP vs TCP

Developers should use UDP when building applications that require low latency and can tolerate some data loss, such as real-time video/audio streaming (e meets developers should learn tcp when building networked applications that require reliable data transmission, such as web servers, databases, or real-time communication tools, as it handles packet loss and ordering automatically. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

UDP

Developers should use UDP when building applications that require low latency and can tolerate some data loss, such as real-time video/audio streaming (e

UDP

Nice Pick

Developers should use UDP when building applications that require low latency and can tolerate some data loss, such as real-time video/audio streaming (e

Pros

  • +g
  • +Related to: tcp, ip

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

TCP

Developers should learn TCP when building networked applications that require reliable data transmission, such as web servers, databases, or real-time communication tools, as it handles packet loss and ordering automatically

Pros

  • +It's crucial for understanding internet fundamentals, debugging network issues, and implementing custom protocols where guaranteed delivery is needed, unlike UDP which is faster but less reliable
  • +Related to: ip, udp

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use UDP if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use TCP if: You prioritize it's crucial for understanding internet fundamentals, debugging network issues, and implementing custom protocols where guaranteed delivery is needed, unlike udp which is faster but less reliable over what UDP offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
UDP wins

Developers should use UDP when building applications that require low latency and can tolerate some data loss, such as real-time video/audio streaming (e

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev