Dynamic

UDP vs Apache Thrift

The speed demon of protocols: no handshakes, no guarantees, just raw data flying at you meets the polyglot's duct tape for stitching together services, because sometimes you just need to make java talk to python without the drama. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

UDP

The speed demon of protocols: no handshakes, no guarantees, just raw data flying at you.

UDP

Nice Pick

The speed demon of protocols: no handshakes, no guarantees, just raw data flying at you.

Pros

  • +Minimal overhead for blazing-fast transmission
  • +No connection setup delays, ideal for real-time apps
  • +Simple design reduces complexity and resource usage

Cons

  • -No delivery guarantees, so packets can vanish into the void
  • -No built-in ordering or duplicate protection, causing chaos in data streams

Apache Thrift

The polyglot's duct tape for stitching together services, because sometimes you just need to make Java talk to Python without the drama.

Pros

  • +Cross-language compatibility with support for over 20 programming languages
  • +Efficient binary protocol for high-performance communication
  • +Code generation from IDL reduces boilerplate and ensures type safety

Cons

  • -Steep learning curve for IDL and setup compared to simpler REST APIs
  • -Limited community and documentation for less popular language bindings

The Verdict

Use UDP if: You want minimal overhead for blazing-fast transmission and can live with no delivery guarantees, so packets can vanish into the void.

Use Apache Thrift if: You prioritize cross-language compatibility with support for over 20 programming languages over what UDP offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
UDP wins

The speed demon of protocols: no handshakes, no guarantees, just raw data flying at you.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev