Dynamic

UDP vs FTP

The speed demon of protocols: no handshakes, no guarantees, just raw data flying at you meets the granddaddy of file transfer, still kicking around like a stubborn old uncle who refuses to retire. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

UDP

The speed demon of protocols: no handshakes, no guarantees, just raw data flying at you.

UDP

Nice Pick

The speed demon of protocols: no handshakes, no guarantees, just raw data flying at you.

Pros

  • +Minimal overhead for blazing-fast transmission
  • +No connection setup delays, ideal for real-time apps
  • +Simple design reduces complexity and resource usage

Cons

  • -No delivery guarantees, so packets can vanish into the void
  • -No built-in ordering or duplicate protection, causing chaos in data streams

FTP

The granddaddy of file transfer, still kicking around like a stubborn old uncle who refuses to retire.

Pros

  • +Widely supported across all platforms and systems
  • +Simple and straightforward for basic file transfers
  • +No fancy dependencies or setup required

Cons

  • -Transfers data in plain text, making it a security nightmare
  • -Requires separate control and data connections, which can be a hassle with firewalls

The Verdict

Use UDP if: You want minimal overhead for blazing-fast transmission and can live with no delivery guarantees, so packets can vanish into the void.

Use FTP if: You prioritize widely supported across all platforms and systems over what UDP offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
UDP wins

The speed demon of protocols: no handshakes, no guarantees, just raw data flying at you.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev