Dynamic

UMD vs CommonJS

Developers should use UMD when creating JavaScript libraries that need to support both server-side (Node meets developers should learn commonjs when working with node. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

UMD

Developers should use UMD when creating JavaScript libraries that need to support both server-side (Node

UMD

Nice Pick

Developers should use UMD when creating JavaScript libraries that need to support both server-side (Node

Pros

  • +js) and client-side (browser) environments, or when targeting projects with mixed module systems
  • +Related to: commonjs, amd

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

CommonJS

Developers should learn CommonJS when working with Node

Pros

  • +js applications, as it is the default module system in Node
  • +Related to: node-js, javascript

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use UMD if: You want js) and client-side (browser) environments, or when targeting projects with mixed module systems and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use CommonJS if: You prioritize js applications, as it is the default module system in node over what UMD offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
UMD wins

Developers should use UMD when creating JavaScript libraries that need to support both server-side (Node

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev