Dynamic

UMD vs CommonJS

Developers should use UMD when creating JavaScript libraries that need to support both server-side (Node meets developers should learn commonjs when working with node. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

UMD

Developers should use UMD when creating JavaScript libraries that need to support both server-side (Node

UMD

Nice Pick

Developers should use UMD when creating JavaScript libraries that need to support both server-side (Node

Pros

  • +js) and client-side (browser) usage, or when targeting environments with different module systems like AMD and CommonJS
  • +Related to: javascript, commonjs

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

CommonJS

Developers should learn CommonJS when working with Node

Pros

  • +js applications, as it is the default module system in Node
  • +Related to: node-js, javascript

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. UMD is a tool while CommonJS is a concept. We picked UMD based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
UMD wins

Based on overall popularity. UMD is more widely used, but CommonJS excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev