UMD vs CommonJS
Developers should use UMD when creating JavaScript libraries that need to support both server-side (Node meets developers should learn commonjs when working with node. Here's our take.
UMD
Developers should use UMD when creating JavaScript libraries that need to support both server-side (Node
UMD
Nice PickDevelopers should use UMD when creating JavaScript libraries that need to support both server-side (Node
Pros
- +js) and client-side (browser) usage, or when targeting environments with different module systems like AMD and CommonJS
- +Related to: javascript, commonjs
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
CommonJS
Developers should learn CommonJS when working with Node
Pros
- +js applications, as it is the default module system in Node
- +Related to: node-js, javascript
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. UMD is a tool while CommonJS is a concept. We picked UMD based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. UMD is more widely used, but CommonJS excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev