Dynamic

UMD vs ES6 Modules

Developers should use UMD when creating JavaScript libraries that need to support both server-side (Node meets developers should learn es6 modules to write modular, maintainable javascript applications, as they provide a clean syntax for splitting code into reusable components and managing dependencies explicitly. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

UMD

Developers should use UMD when creating JavaScript libraries that need to support both server-side (Node

UMD

Nice Pick

Developers should use UMD when creating JavaScript libraries that need to support both server-side (Node

Pros

  • +js) and client-side (browser) usage, or when targeting environments with different module systems like AMD and CommonJS
  • +Related to: javascript, commonjs

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

ES6 Modules

Developers should learn ES6 Modules to write modular, maintainable JavaScript applications, as they provide a clean syntax for splitting code into reusable components and managing dependencies explicitly

Pros

  • +They are essential for modern web development with frameworks like React or Vue, and for building scalable Node
  • +Related to: javascript, ecmascript

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. UMD is a tool while ES6 Modules is a concept. We picked UMD based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
UMD wins

Based on overall popularity. UMD is more widely used, but ES6 Modules excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev