UMD vs ES6 Modules
Developers should use UMD when creating JavaScript libraries that need to support both server-side (Node meets developers should learn es6 modules to write modular, maintainable javascript applications, as they provide a clean syntax for splitting code into reusable components and managing dependencies explicitly. Here's our take.
UMD
Developers should use UMD when creating JavaScript libraries that need to support both server-side (Node
UMD
Nice PickDevelopers should use UMD when creating JavaScript libraries that need to support both server-side (Node
Pros
- +js) and client-side (browser) usage, or when targeting environments with different module systems like AMD and CommonJS
- +Related to: javascript, commonjs
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
ES6 Modules
Developers should learn ES6 Modules to write modular, maintainable JavaScript applications, as they provide a clean syntax for splitting code into reusable components and managing dependencies explicitly
Pros
- +They are essential for modern web development with frameworks like React or Vue, and for building scalable Node
- +Related to: javascript, ecmascript
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. UMD is a tool while ES6 Modules is a concept. We picked UMD based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. UMD is more widely used, but ES6 Modules excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev