Underscore.js vs Lodash

Developers should learn Underscore meets developers should learn lodash when working on javascript projects that involve heavy data manipulation, as it reduces boilerplate code and handles edge cases (like null values) more robustly than native methods. Here's our take.

Underscore.js

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Underscore

Pros

• js when working on legacy codebases or projects that rely on its utilities for functional programming patterns
• Related to: javascript, functional-programming

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Lodash

Developers should learn Lodash when working on JavaScript projects that involve heavy data manipulation, as it reduces boilerplate code and handles edge cases (like null values) more robustly than native methods

Pros

• It's particularly useful in applications dealing with large datasets, functional programming patterns, or when consistency across different environments is critical, such as in full-stack development or legacy browser support
• Related to: javascript, functional-programming

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Underscore.js if: You want js when working on legacy codebases or projects that rely on its utilities for functional programming patterns and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Lodash if: You prioritize it's particularly useful in applications dealing with large datasets, functional programming patterns, or when consistency across different environments is critical, such as in full-stack development or legacy browser support over what Underscore.js offers.

The Bottom Line

Underscore.js wins

Developers should learn Underscore