Universal APK vs Dynamic Feature Modules

Developers should use Universal APK when targeting a broad audience across diverse Android devices with different CPU architectures, especially for smaller apps or in development/testing phases where managing multiple APKs is cumbersome meets developers should use dynamic feature modules when building large android apps where reducing initial download size is critical for user acquisition and retention, such as in markets with limited bandwidth or storage. Here's our take.

Universal APK

Nice Pick

Developers should use Universal APK when targeting a broad audience across diverse Android devices with different CPU architectures, especially for smaller apps or in development/testing phases where managing multiple APKs is cumbersome

Pros

• It's ideal for apps distributed outside Google Play (e
• Related to: android-app-bundle, apk-signing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Dynamic Feature Modules

Developers should use Dynamic Feature Modules when building large Android apps where reducing initial download size is critical for user acquisition and retention, such as in markets with limited bandwidth or storage

Pros

• It's particularly useful for apps with optional features that only a subset of users need, like region-specific content, premium features, or experimental functionality, allowing for more efficient app delivery and updates
• Related to: android-app-bundle, android-studio

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Universal APK is a platform while Dynamic Feature Modules is a methodology. We picked Universal APK based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Universal APK wins

Based on overall popularity. Universal APK is more widely used, but Dynamic Feature Modules excels in its own space.