Unregulated Development vs Waterfall Methodology
Developers might encounter or use unregulated development in startup environments, hackathons, or personal projects where the primary goal is to quickly validate ideas or build minimum viable products (MVPs) meets developers should learn and use the waterfall methodology in projects with well-defined, stable requirements and low uncertainty, such as government contracts, safety-critical systems, or large-scale infrastructure where changes are costly. Here's our take.
Unregulated Development
Developers might encounter or use unregulated development in startup environments, hackathons, or personal projects where the primary goal is to quickly validate ideas or build minimum viable products (MVPs)
Unregulated Development
Nice PickDevelopers might encounter or use unregulated development in startup environments, hackathons, or personal projects where the primary goal is to quickly validate ideas or build minimum viable products (MVPs)
Pros
- +It can be appropriate when experimenting with new technologies or in situations where formal processes would hinder innovation, but it should be transitioned to more structured methodologies as projects scale to ensure long-term sustainability and quality
- +Related to: agile-methodology, devops
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Waterfall Methodology
Developers should learn and use the Waterfall Methodology in projects with well-defined, stable requirements and low uncertainty, such as government contracts, safety-critical systems, or large-scale infrastructure where changes are costly
Pros
- +It is suitable when regulatory compliance, detailed documentation, and predictable timelines are priorities, as it provides a structured framework for managing complex, long-term projects
- +Related to: software-development-life-cycle, project-management
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Unregulated Development if: You want it can be appropriate when experimenting with new technologies or in situations where formal processes would hinder innovation, but it should be transitioned to more structured methodologies as projects scale to ensure long-term sustainability and quality and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Waterfall Methodology if: You prioritize it is suitable when regulatory compliance, detailed documentation, and predictable timelines are priorities, as it provides a structured framework for managing complex, long-term projects over what Unregulated Development offers.
Developers might encounter or use unregulated development in startup environments, hackathons, or personal projects where the primary goal is to quickly validate ideas or build minimum viable products (MVPs)
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev