Unreliable Messaging vs Reliable Messaging
Developers should use unreliable messaging when building applications that require minimal latency and can tolerate some data loss, such as live video/audio streaming, online multiplayer games, or IoT sensor data where timeliness is critical meets developers should learn and implement reliable messaging when building systems that require high data integrity and consistency, such as e-commerce order processing, banking transactions, or real-time analytics pipelines. Here's our take.
Unreliable Messaging
Developers should use unreliable messaging when building applications that require minimal latency and can tolerate some data loss, such as live video/audio streaming, online multiplayer games, or IoT sensor data where timeliness is critical
Unreliable Messaging
Nice PickDevelopers should use unreliable messaging when building applications that require minimal latency and can tolerate some data loss, such as live video/audio streaming, online multiplayer games, or IoT sensor data where timeliness is critical
Pros
- +It reduces overhead compared to reliable protocols like TCP, making it suitable for high-frequency, low-priority data where retransmissions would be inefficient or disruptive
- +Related to: udp, distributed-systems
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Reliable Messaging
Developers should learn and implement Reliable Messaging when building systems that require high data integrity and consistency, such as e-commerce order processing, banking transactions, or real-time analytics pipelines
Pros
- +It is crucial in scenarios where message loss or duplication could lead to critical errors, like double-charging customers or corrupted data states, ensuring that applications remain robust under unreliable network conditions
- +Related to: message-queues, event-driven-architecture
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Unreliable Messaging if: You want it reduces overhead compared to reliable protocols like tcp, making it suitable for high-frequency, low-priority data where retransmissions would be inefficient or disruptive and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Reliable Messaging if: You prioritize it is crucial in scenarios where message loss or duplication could lead to critical errors, like double-charging customers or corrupted data states, ensuring that applications remain robust under unreliable network conditions over what Unreliable Messaging offers.
Developers should use unreliable messaging when building applications that require minimal latency and can tolerate some data loss, such as live video/audio streaming, online multiplayer games, or IoT sensor data where timeliness is critical
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev