Dynamic

Video.js vs MediaElement.js

Developers should use Video meets developers should use mediaelement. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Video.js

Developers should use Video

Video.js

Nice Pick

Developers should use Video

Pros

  • +js when they need a customizable, cross-browser video player that goes beyond the basic HTML5 <video> element, such as for media-heavy websites, streaming services, or educational platforms
  • +Related to: javascript, html5-video

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

MediaElement.js

Developers should use MediaElement

Pros

  • +js when building web applications that require cross-browser compatible media playback with a consistent user experience, especially for projects targeting diverse audiences using older browsers
  • +Related to: html5-video, javascript

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Video.js if: You want js when they need a customizable, cross-browser video player that goes beyond the basic html5 <video> element, such as for media-heavy websites, streaming services, or educational platforms and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use MediaElement.js if: You prioritize js when building web applications that require cross-browser compatible media playback with a consistent user experience, especially for projects targeting diverse audiences using older browsers over what Video.js offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Video.js wins

Developers should use Video

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev