Dynamic

Vimscript vs Emacs Lisp

The language that makes Vim powerful, but also the reason you'll need a therapist after debugging it meets the lisp that turns your text editor into an os, whether you wanted one or not. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Vimscript

The language that makes Vim powerful, but also the reason you'll need a therapist after debugging it.

Vimscript

Nice Pick

The language that makes Vim powerful, but also the reason you'll need a therapist after debugging it.

Pros

  • +Deep integration with Vim's core features like buffers and modes
  • +Enables complex automation and custom key mappings
  • +Widely supported by the Vim plugin ecosystem

Cons

  • -Syntax can be arcane and inconsistent, making debugging a nightmare
  • -Limited modern language features compared to alternatives like Lua

Emacs Lisp

The Lisp that turns your text editor into an OS, whether you wanted one or not.

Pros

  • +Tight integration with Emacs allows for deep editor customization
  • +Dynamic scoping and macros enable powerful, expressive code
  • +Mature ecosystem with extensive libraries for text processing

Cons

  • -Dynamic scoping can lead to confusing bugs and debugging headaches
  • -Steep learning curve for those new to Lisp or Emacs's idiosyncrasies

The Verdict

Use Vimscript if: You want deep integration with vim's core features like buffers and modes and can live with syntax can be arcane and inconsistent, making debugging a nightmare.

Use Emacs Lisp if: You prioritize tight integration with emacs allows for deep editor customization over what Vimscript offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Vimscript wins

The language that makes Vim powerful, but also the reason you'll need a therapist after debugging it.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev