Vimscript vs Lua
The language that makes Vim powerful, but also the reason you'll need a therapist after debugging it meets the swiss army knife of scripting languages. Here's our take.
Vimscript
The language that makes Vim powerful, but also the reason you'll need a therapist after debugging it.
Vimscript
Nice PickThe language that makes Vim powerful, but also the reason you'll need a therapist after debugging it.
Pros
- +Deep integration with Vim's core features like buffers and modes
- +Enables complex automation and custom key mappings
- +Widely supported by the Vim plugin ecosystem
Cons
- -Syntax can be arcane and inconsistent, making debugging a nightmare
- -Limited modern language features compared to alternatives like Lua
Lua
The Swiss Army knife of scripting languages. Tiny, fast, and perfect for embedding, but don't expect a full kitchen sink.
Pros
- +Extremely lightweight and fast, ideal for embedded systems
- +Simple syntax that's easy to learn and integrate
- +Excellent for game scripting and extensibility in applications
Cons
- -Limited standard library compared to languages like Python
- -Can be quirky with error handling and debugging tools
The Verdict
Use Vimscript if: You want deep integration with vim's core features like buffers and modes and can live with syntax can be arcane and inconsistent, making debugging a nightmare.
Use Lua if: You prioritize extremely lightweight and fast, ideal for embedded systems over what Vimscript offers.
The language that makes Vim powerful, but also the reason you'll need a therapist after debugging it.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev