Virtual Private Network vs Zero Trust Network

Developers should learn VPNs for secure remote work, accessing corporate resources, and testing geo-restricted applications meets developers should learn zero trust principles when building or securing modern applications, especially in cloud-native, hybrid, or distributed environments where traditional perimeter defenses are insufficient. Here's our take.

Virtual Private Network

Nice Pick

Developers should learn VPNs for secure remote work, accessing corporate resources, and testing geo-restricted applications

Pros

• They are essential for protecting sensitive data in public Wi-Fi environments and for simulating network conditions in development and QA testing
• Related to: network-security, encryption

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Zero Trust Network

Developers should learn Zero Trust principles when building or securing modern applications, especially in cloud-native, hybrid, or distributed environments where traditional perimeter defenses are insufficient

Pros

• It's crucial for protecting sensitive data, complying with regulations like GDPR or HIPAA, and mitigating threats like insider attacks or compromised credentials
• Related to: identity-and-access-management, network-security

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Virtual Private Network is a tool while Zero Trust Network is a concept. We picked Virtual Private Network based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Virtual Private Network wins

Based on overall popularity. Virtual Private Network is more widely used, but Zero Trust Network excels in its own space.