Virtual Private Network vs Zero Trust Networks

Developers should learn and use VPNs when working remotely to securely access corporate resources, testing geo-restricted applications, or protecting sensitive data on public Wi-Fi meets developers should learn zero trust networks to build secure applications in modern environments like cloud, remote work, and hybrid infrastructures, where traditional network perimeters are ineffective. Here's our take.

Virtual Private Network

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use VPNs when working remotely to securely access corporate resources, testing geo-restricted applications, or protecting sensitive data on public Wi-Fi

Pros

• It's essential for implementing secure communication channels in distributed systems, ensuring compliance with data protection regulations, and safeguarding against eavesdropping or man-in-the-middle attacks in untrusted networks
• Related to: network-security, encryption

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Zero Trust Networks

Developers should learn Zero Trust Networks to build secure applications in modern environments like cloud, remote work, and hybrid infrastructures, where traditional network perimeters are ineffective

Pros

• It's crucial for protecting sensitive data, complying with regulations (e
• Related to: identity-and-access-management, network-security

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Virtual Private Network is a tool while Zero Trust Networks is a concept. We picked Virtual Private Network based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Virtual Private Network wins

Based on overall popularity. Virtual Private Network is more widely used, but Zero Trust Networks excels in its own space.