Visual Inspection vs Leviathan

The OG bug catcher meets nsa's digital wrecking ball. Here's our take.

Visual Inspection

Nice Pick

The OG bug catcher. No fancy tools, just eyeballs and coffee.

Pros

• Catches subtle UI/UX issues automated tests miss
• Requires no setup or dependencies
• Encourages team collaboration and knowledge sharing

Cons

• Highly subjective and prone to human error
• Time-consuming and not scalable for large codebases

Leviathan

NSA's digital wrecking ball. Because sometimes you need to break things to see if they're strong enough.

Pros

• Automates complex penetration testing workflows with NSA-grade techniques
• Excellent for red team exercises to simulate real-world adversary attacks
• Integrates reconnaissance, exploitation, and post-exploitation in one framework

Cons

• Steep learning curve due to advanced features and military-grade complexity
• Requires deep cybersecurity knowledge to use effectively and ethically

The Verdict

Use Visual Inspection if: You want catches subtle ui/ux issues automated tests miss and can live with highly subjective and prone to human error.

Use Leviathan if: You prioritize automates complex penetration testing workflows with nsa-grade techniques over what Visual Inspection offers.

The Bottom Line

Visual Inspection wins

The OG bug catcher. No fancy tools, just eyeballs and coffee.