Visual Inspection vs Titanoboa

The OG bug catcher meets the low-code workflow beast that doesn't make you choose between drag-and-drop simplicity and actual code. Here's our take.

Visual Inspection

Nice Pick

The OG bug catcher. No fancy tools, just eyeballs and coffee.

Pros

• Catches subtle UI/UX issues automated tests miss
• Requires no setup or dependencies
• Encourages team collaboration and knowledge sharing

Cons

• Highly subjective and prone to human error
• Time-consuming and not scalable for large codebases

Titanoboa

The low-code workflow beast that doesn't make you choose between drag-and-drop simplicity and actual code.

Pros

• Visual editor makes complex workflows approachable for non-developers
• Supports Python and JavaScript scripting for when you need real logic
• Open-source and free, avoiding vendor lock-in
• Handles event-driven processes and system integrations smoothly

Cons

• Can feel bloated for simple automation tasks
• Learning curve spikes when mixing visual and code-based components

The Verdict

Use Visual Inspection if: You want catches subtle ui/ux issues automated tests miss and can live with highly subjective and prone to human error.

Use Titanoboa if: You prioritize visual editor makes complex workflows approachable for non-developers over what Visual Inspection offers.

The Bottom Line

Visual Inspection wins

The OG bug catcher. No fancy tools, just eyeballs and coffee.