Waterfall Deployment vs Continuous Deployment
Developers should use Waterfall Deployment in projects with well-defined, stable requirements and low uncertainty, such as government contracts, large-scale infrastructure systems, or safety-critical applications where regulatory compliance is essential meets developers should learn and use continuous deployment to achieve faster release cycles, reduce human error in deployments, and improve software quality through automated testing. Here's our take.
Waterfall Deployment
Developers should use Waterfall Deployment in projects with well-defined, stable requirements and low uncertainty, such as government contracts, large-scale infrastructure systems, or safety-critical applications where regulatory compliance is essential
Waterfall Deployment
Nice PickDevelopers should use Waterfall Deployment in projects with well-defined, stable requirements and low uncertainty, such as government contracts, large-scale infrastructure systems, or safety-critical applications where regulatory compliance is essential
Pros
- +It is suitable when the project scope is fixed, changes are costly or impractical, and a predictable timeline and budget are prioritized over flexibility, as it provides clear milestones and documentation for stakeholders
- +Related to: software-development-lifecycle, project-management
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Continuous Deployment
Developers should learn and use Continuous Deployment to achieve faster release cycles, reduce human error in deployments, and improve software quality through automated testing
Pros
- +It is particularly valuable for web applications, SaaS products, and microservices architectures where frequent updates are needed to respond to user feedback or market changes
- +Related to: continuous-integration, devops
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Waterfall Deployment if: You want it is suitable when the project scope is fixed, changes are costly or impractical, and a predictable timeline and budget are prioritized over flexibility, as it provides clear milestones and documentation for stakeholders and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Continuous Deployment if: You prioritize it is particularly valuable for web applications, saas products, and microservices architectures where frequent updates are needed to respond to user feedback or market changes over what Waterfall Deployment offers.
Developers should use Waterfall Deployment in projects with well-defined, stable requirements and low uncertainty, such as government contracts, large-scale infrastructure systems, or safety-critical applications where regulatory compliance is essential
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev