Waterfall vs Kanban
Developers should learn Waterfall for projects with well-defined, stable requirements and low uncertainty, such as government contracts, safety-critical systems (e meets developers should learn kanban when working in fast-paced, iterative environments where priorities shift frequently, as it provides real-time visibility into work status and helps manage workflow without fixed sprints. Here's our take.
Waterfall
Developers should learn Waterfall for projects with well-defined, stable requirements and low uncertainty, such as government contracts, safety-critical systems (e
Waterfall
Nice PickDevelopers should learn Waterfall for projects with well-defined, stable requirements and low uncertainty, such as government contracts, safety-critical systems (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: agile-methodology, project-management
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Kanban
Developers should learn Kanban when working in fast-paced, iterative environments where priorities shift frequently, as it provides real-time visibility into work status and helps manage workflow without fixed sprints
Pros
- +It is particularly useful for maintenance teams, support operations, or projects with unpredictable workloads, as it reduces cycle times and improves responsiveness to changes
- +Related to: agile-methodology, scrum
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Waterfall if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Kanban if: You prioritize it is particularly useful for maintenance teams, support operations, or projects with unpredictable workloads, as it reduces cycle times and improves responsiveness to changes over what Waterfall offers.
Developers should learn Waterfall for projects with well-defined, stable requirements and low uncertainty, such as government contracts, safety-critical systems (e
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev