Dynamic

WCAG Compliance vs EN 301 549

Developers should learn and implement WCAG Compliance to meet legal requirements (e meets developers should learn and use en 301 549 when creating ict products or services for the european market, especially for public sector projects where compliance is legally required. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

WCAG Compliance

Developers should learn and implement WCAG Compliance to meet legal requirements (e

WCAG Compliance

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and implement WCAG Compliance to meet legal requirements (e

Pros

  • +g
  • +Related to: web-accessibility, aria-attributes

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

EN 301 549

Developers should learn and use EN 301 549 when creating ICT products or services for the European market, especially for public sector projects where compliance is legally required

Pros

  • +It is essential for ensuring that applications, websites, and devices are accessible to all users, reducing legal risks and improving user experience
  • +Related to: web-content-accessibility-guidelines, accessibility-testing

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use WCAG Compliance if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use EN 301 549 if: You prioritize it is essential for ensuring that applications, websites, and devices are accessible to all users, reducing legal risks and improving user experience over what WCAG Compliance offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
WCAG Compliance wins

Developers should learn and implement WCAG Compliance to meet legal requirements (e

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev