WCAG vs EN 301 549

Developers should learn and apply WCAG to ensure their digital products are inclusive and compliant with legal requirements like the ADA in the U meets developers should learn and use en 301 549 when creating ict products or services for the european market, especially for public sector projects where compliance is legally required. Here's our take.

WCAG

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and apply WCAG to ensure their digital products are inclusive and compliant with legal requirements like the ADA in the U

Pros

• S
• Related to: aria, html-semantics

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

EN 301 549

Developers should learn and use EN 301 549 when creating ICT products or services for the European market, especially for public sector projects where compliance is legally required

Pros

• It is essential for ensuring that applications, websites, and devices are accessible to all users, reducing legal risks and improving user experience
• Related to: web-content-accessibility-guidelines, accessibility-testing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use WCAG if: You want s and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use EN 301 549 if: You prioritize it is essential for ensuring that applications, websites, and devices are accessible to all users, reducing legal risks and improving user experience over what WCAG offers.

The Bottom Line

WCAG wins

Developers should learn and apply WCAG to ensure their digital products are inclusive and compliant with legal requirements like the ADA in the U