Dynamic

Web Accessibility vs Non Accessible Design

Developers should learn and implement Web Accessibility to comply with legal requirements (e meets developers should learn about non accessible design to understand common pitfalls and avoid creating exclusionary products, as it highlights the negative consequences of neglecting accessibility. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Web Accessibility

Developers should learn and implement Web Accessibility to comply with legal requirements (e

Web Accessibility

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and implement Web Accessibility to comply with legal requirements (e

Pros

  • +g
  • +Related to: html-semantics, aria-attributes

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Non Accessible Design

Developers should learn about Non Accessible Design to understand common pitfalls and avoid creating exclusionary products, as it highlights the negative consequences of neglecting accessibility

Pros

  • +This knowledge is crucial for compliance with legal requirements like the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and for building inclusive software that serves a broader audience
  • +Related to: web-accessibility, wcag

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Web Accessibility if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Non Accessible Design if: You prioritize this knowledge is crucial for compliance with legal requirements like the americans with disabilities act (ada) and for building inclusive software that serves a broader audience over what Web Accessibility offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Web Accessibility wins

Developers should learn and implement Web Accessibility to comply with legal requirements (e

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev