Web Caching vs Server Side Rendering

Developers should implement web caching to enhance website performance, especially for high-traffic sites or applications with static or semi-static content meets developers should use ssr when building applications that require fast initial page loads, improved seo for search engine crawlers, or better performance on low-powered devices. Here's our take.

Web Caching

Nice Pick

Developers should implement web caching to enhance website performance, especially for high-traffic sites or applications with static or semi-static content

Pros

• It's crucial for reducing server costs, improving scalability, and meeting performance benchmarks like Core Web Vitals
• Related to: http-headers, content-delivery-network

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Server Side Rendering

Developers should use SSR when building applications that require fast initial page loads, improved SEO for search engine crawlers, or better performance on low-powered devices

Pros

• It's particularly useful for content-heavy websites like blogs, e-commerce platforms, and news sites where first contentful paint is critical
• Related to: next-js, nuxt-js

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Web Caching if: You want it's crucial for reducing server costs, improving scalability, and meeting performance benchmarks like core web vitals and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Server Side Rendering if: You prioritize it's particularly useful for content-heavy websites like blogs, e-commerce platforms, and news sites where first contentful paint is critical over what Web Caching offers.

The Bottom Line

Web Caching wins

Developers should implement web caching to enhance website performance, especially for high-traffic sites or applications with static or semi-static content