Web Services vs GraphQL

Developers should learn Web Services to build scalable, interoperable systems, such as microservices architectures, mobile app backends, or integrations between enterprise applications meets developers should learn graphql when building modern web or mobile applications that require flexible, efficient data fetching, such as in complex frontend-backend integrations or microservices architectures. Here's our take.

Web Services

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Web Services to build scalable, interoperable systems, such as microservices architectures, mobile app backends, or integrations between enterprise applications

Pros

• They are essential for creating APIs that allow third-party developers to extend functionality, enabling features like payment processing, social media logins, or data aggregation from external sources
• Related to: rest-api, soap

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

GraphQL

Developers should learn GraphQL when building modern web or mobile applications that require flexible, efficient data fetching, such as in complex frontend-backend integrations or microservices architectures

Pros

• It's particularly useful for scenarios where clients need to avoid multiple round-trips to servers or when APIs must evolve without breaking existing queries
• Related to: apollo-client, relay

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Web Services is a concept while GraphQL is a tool. We picked Web Services based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Web Services wins

Based on overall popularity. Web Services is more widely used, but GraphQL excels in its own space.