Dynamic
WebSocket vs tRPC
HTTP's chatty cousin meets typescript's love letter to api developers. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
WebSocket
HTTP's chatty cousin. Real-time without the constant handshakes.
WebSocket
Nice PickHTTP's chatty cousin. Real-time without the constant handshakes.
Pros
- +Full-duplex communication reduces latency for real-time apps
- +Persistent connection eliminates HTTP overhead per message
- +Widely supported in modern browsers and servers
Cons
- -Requires explicit connection management and error handling
- -Can be tricky with firewalls and proxies that block non-HTTP traffic
tRPC
TypeScript's love letter to API developers. Write types once, cry about mismatched schemas never.
Pros
- +End-to-end type safety without code generation
- +Seamless autocompletion and real-time error prevention
- +Reduces boilerplate by sharing types between client and server
Cons
- -Tightly coupled to TypeScript, limiting use in non-TypeScript projects
- -Can feel like magic, making debugging more opaque when things go wrong
The Verdict
Use WebSocket if: You want full-duplex communication reduces latency for real-time apps and can live with requires explicit connection management and error handling.
Use tRPC if: You prioritize end-to-end type safety without code generation over what WebSocket offers.
🧊
The Bottom Line
WebSocket wins
HTTP's chatty cousin. Real-time without the constant handshakes.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev