Dynamic

WebSocket vs tRPC

HTTP's chatty cousin meets typescript's love letter to api developers. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

WebSocket

HTTP's chatty cousin. Real-time without the constant handshakes.

WebSocket

Nice Pick

HTTP's chatty cousin. Real-time without the constant handshakes.

Pros

  • +Full-duplex communication reduces latency for real-time apps
  • +Persistent connection eliminates HTTP overhead per message
  • +Widely supported in modern browsers and servers

Cons

  • -Requires explicit connection management and error handling
  • -Can be tricky with firewalls and proxies that block non-HTTP traffic

tRPC

TypeScript's love letter to API developers. Write types once, cry about mismatched schemas never.

Pros

  • +End-to-end type safety without code generation
  • +Seamless autocompletion and real-time error prevention
  • +Reduces boilerplate by sharing types between client and server

Cons

  • -Tightly coupled to TypeScript, limiting use in non-TypeScript projects
  • -Can feel like magic, making debugging more opaque when things go wrong

The Verdict

Use WebSocket if: You want full-duplex communication reduces latency for real-time apps and can live with requires explicit connection management and error handling.

Use tRPC if: You prioritize end-to-end type safety without code generation over what WebSocket offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
WebSocket wins

HTTP's chatty cousin. Real-time without the constant handshakes.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev