Web Storage vs IndexedDB

Developers should use Web Storage when they need to store non-sensitive data client-side, such as user preferences, form data, or application state, to improve performance and user experience by reducing server requests meets developers should learn indexeddb when building progressive web apps (pwas) or any web application that requires robust offline capabilities, such as note-taking apps, document editors, or media players. Here's our take.

Web Storage

Nice Pick

Developers should use Web Storage when they need to store non-sensitive data client-side, such as user preferences, form data, or application state, to improve performance and user experience by reducing server requests

Pros

• It's particularly useful for offline web applications, caching data, and maintaining state in single-page applications (SPAs) without relying on cookies
• Related to: javascript, html5

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

IndexedDB

Developers should learn IndexedDB when building progressive web apps (PWAs) or any web application that requires robust offline capabilities, such as note-taking apps, document editors, or media players

Pros

• It's essential for scenarios where users need to access and manipulate data without an internet connection, and for caching large datasets like product catalogs or user-generated content to reduce server load and latency
• Related to: javascript, progressive-web-apps

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Web Storage is a concept while IndexedDB is a database. We picked Web Storage based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Web Storage wins

Based on overall popularity. Web Storage is more widely used, but IndexedDB excels in its own space.