Web Storage vs Web SQL Database

Developers should use Web Storage when they need to store non-sensitive data client-side, such as user preferences, form data, or application state, to improve performance and user experience by reducing server requests meets developers should learn web sql primarily for maintaining legacy web applications that still use it, as it was widely implemented in browsers like chrome and safari before being deprecated. Here's our take.

Web Storage

Nice Pick

Developers should use Web Storage when they need to store non-sensitive data client-side, such as user preferences, form data, or application state, to improve performance and user experience by reducing server requests

Pros

• It's particularly useful for offline web applications, caching data, and maintaining state in single-page applications (SPAs) without relying on cookies
• Related to: javascript, html5

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Web SQL Database

Developers should learn Web SQL primarily for maintaining legacy web applications that still use it, as it was widely implemented in browsers like Chrome and Safari before being deprecated

Pros

• It's useful for understanding client-side data storage evolution and for projects requiring simple, SQL-based local storage in older environments, though modern alternatives are recommended for new development
• Related to: indexeddb, localstorage

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Web Storage is a concept while Web SQL Database is a database. We picked Web Storage based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Web Storage wins

Based on overall popularity. Web Storage is more widely used, but Web SQL Database excels in its own space.