Web2 Development vs Static Site Generation

Developers should learn Web2 Development for building mainstream web applications such as social networks, online marketplaces, and SaaS products, where centralized management and user interaction are key meets developers should use ssg for content-heavy sites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing pages where content changes infrequently, as it offers superior performance, security (no server-side vulnerabilities), and low hosting costs. Here's our take.

Web2 Development

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Web2 Development for building mainstream web applications such as social networks, online marketplaces, and SaaS products, where centralized management and user interaction are key

Pros

• It is essential for careers in traditional tech companies, as it underpins most current web infrastructure, including responsive design, real-time updates, and integration with third-party services
• Related to: javascript, ajax

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Static Site Generation

Developers should use SSG for content-heavy sites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing pages where content changes infrequently, as it offers superior performance, security (no server-side vulnerabilities), and low hosting costs

Pros

• It's ideal for projects requiring SEO optimization, global scalability via CDNs, and simplified deployment workflows, especially when combined with modern frameworks like Next
• Related to: next-js, gatsby

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Web2 Development is a concept while Static Site Generation is a methodology. We picked Web2 Development based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Web2 Development wins

Based on overall popularity. Web2 Development is more widely used, but Static Site Generation excels in its own space.