Dynamic

WebAssembly vs Native Client

Developers should learn WebAssembly when building performance-critical web applications, such as games, video editing tools, or scientific simulations, where JavaScript alone may not suffice meets developers should learn native client for building high-performance web applications that require intensive computation, such as games, multimedia processing, or scientific simulations, where javascript performance is insufficient. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

WebAssembly

Developers should learn WebAssembly when building performance-critical web applications, such as games, video editing tools, or scientific simulations, where JavaScript alone may not suffice

WebAssembly

Nice Pick

Developers should learn WebAssembly when building performance-critical web applications, such as games, video editing tools, or scientific simulations, where JavaScript alone may not suffice

Pros

  • +It is also valuable for porting existing codebases written in languages like C++ to the web, enabling legacy applications to run in browsers without rewriting
  • +Related to: javascript, rust

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Native Client

Developers should learn Native Client for building high-performance web applications that require intensive computation, such as games, multimedia processing, or scientific simulations, where JavaScript performance is insufficient

Pros

  • +It is particularly useful when porting existing C/C++ codebases to the web without rewriting them in JavaScript, offering a bridge between native desktop applications and web platforms
  • +Related to: webassembly, c

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use WebAssembly if: You want it is also valuable for porting existing codebases written in languages like c++ to the web, enabling legacy applications to run in browsers without rewriting and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Native Client if: You prioritize it is particularly useful when porting existing c/c++ codebases to the web without rewriting them in javascript, offering a bridge between native desktop applications and web platforms over what WebAssembly offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
WebAssembly wins

Developers should learn WebAssembly when building performance-critical web applications, such as games, video editing tools, or scientific simulations, where JavaScript alone may not suffice

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev