WebAuthn vs OAuth
Developers should learn and implement WebAuthn when building applications that require strong authentication, such as banking, healthcare, or enterprise systems, to reduce security vulnerabilities associated with passwords meets developers should learn oauth when building applications that need to integrate with external services (e. Here's our take.
WebAuthn
Developers should learn and implement WebAuthn when building applications that require strong authentication, such as banking, healthcare, or enterprise systems, to reduce security vulnerabilities associated with passwords
WebAuthn
Nice PickDevelopers should learn and implement WebAuthn when building applications that require strong authentication, such as banking, healthcare, or enterprise systems, to reduce security vulnerabilities associated with passwords
Pros
- +It is particularly useful for compliance with regulations like GDPR or for enhancing user experience in consumer-facing apps by enabling quick, secure logins
- +Related to: fido2, public-key-cryptography
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
OAuth
Developers should learn OAuth when building applications that need to integrate with external services (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: openid-connect, jwt
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use WebAuthn if: You want it is particularly useful for compliance with regulations like gdpr or for enhancing user experience in consumer-facing apps by enabling quick, secure logins and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use OAuth if: You prioritize g over what WebAuthn offers.
Developers should learn and implement WebAuthn when building applications that require strong authentication, such as banking, healthcare, or enterprise systems, to reduce security vulnerabilities associated with passwords
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev