Dynamic

Workers vs Vultr

Serverless edge computing that actually works, because who wants to babysit servers? meets the cloud provider that actually lets you spin up a server without needing a phd in cloud architecture. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Workers

Serverless edge computing that actually works, because who wants to babysit servers?

Workers

Nice Pick

Serverless edge computing that actually works, because who wants to babysit servers?

Pros

  • +Globally distributed edge network for ultra-low latency
  • +No server management or cold starts to worry about
  • +Supports JavaScript, WebAssembly, and other languages
  • +Built-in DDoS protection and security features

Cons

  • -Pricing can get tricky with high-volume usage
  • -Limited execution time per request (10ms CPU time for free tier)
  • -Debugging edge-specific issues can be a pain

Vultr

The cloud provider that actually lets you spin up a server without needing a PhD in cloud architecture.

Pros

  • +Simple, no-nonsense pricing with hourly billing
  • +Global data centers with consistent performance
  • +Easy-to-use control panel and API for quick deployments
  • +Wide selection of OS and app templates for rapid setup

Cons

  • -Fewer advanced enterprise features compared to AWS or Azure
  • -Support can be slow for non-critical issues

The Verdict

Use Workers if: You want globally distributed edge network for ultra-low latency and can live with pricing can get tricky with high-volume usage.

Use Vultr if: You prioritize simple, no-nonsense pricing with hourly billing over what Workers offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Workers wins

Serverless edge computing that actually works, because who wants to babysit servers?

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev