Dynamic

xml.etree.ElementTree vs minidom

Developers should use xml meets developers should learn minidom when they need to handle xml data in python for small to medium-sized files, such as configuration files, data interchange formats, or simple web scraping, where a full dom parser like lxml would be overkill. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

xml.etree.ElementTree

Developers should use xml

xml.etree.ElementTree

Nice Pick

Developers should use xml

Pros

  • +etree
  • +Related to: python, xml-parsing

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

minidom

Developers should learn minidom when they need to handle XML data in Python for small to medium-sized files, such as configuration files, data interchange formats, or simple web scraping, where a full DOM parser like lxml would be overkill

Pros

  • +It is particularly useful in environments where external dependencies are restricted, as it comes built-in with Python, ensuring portability and ease of deployment
  • +Related to: python, xml-parsing

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use xml.etree.ElementTree if: You want etree and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use minidom if: You prioritize it is particularly useful in environments where external dependencies are restricted, as it comes built-in with python, ensuring portability and ease of deployment over what xml.etree.ElementTree offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
xml.etree.ElementTree wins

Developers should use xml

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev