Dynamic

XMLHttpRequest vs Axios

Developers should learn XMLHttpRequest for maintaining or updating older web applications that rely on AJAX, as it provides backward compatibility with legacy codebases meets developers should learn and use axios when building web applications that require reliable http communication, such as single-page applications (spas), mobile apps with react native, or backend services in node. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

XMLHttpRequest

Developers should learn XMLHttpRequest for maintaining or updating older web applications that rely on AJAX, as it provides backward compatibility with legacy codebases

XMLHttpRequest

Nice Pick

Developers should learn XMLHttpRequest for maintaining or updating older web applications that rely on AJAX, as it provides backward compatibility with legacy codebases

Pros

  • +It is also useful for understanding the evolution of web APIs and for scenarios where fine-grained control over HTTP requests (e
  • +Related to: javascript, ajax

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Axios

Developers should learn and use Axios when building web applications that require reliable HTTP communication, such as single-page applications (SPAs), mobile apps with React Native, or backend services in Node

Pros

  • +js
  • +Related to: javascript, node-js

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. XMLHttpRequest is a tool while Axios is a library. We picked XMLHttpRequest based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
XMLHttpRequest wins

Based on overall popularity. XMLHttpRequest is more widely used, but Axios excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev