XMLHttpRequest vs jQuery Ajax

Developers should learn XMLHttpRequest for maintaining or updating older web applications that rely on AJAX, as it provides backward compatibility with legacy codebases meets developers should learn jquery ajax when working on legacy web projects or maintaining older codebases that rely on jquery, as it was widely used for client-side scripting before modern javascript frameworks. Here's our take.

XMLHttpRequest

Nice Pick

Developers should learn XMLHttpRequest for maintaining or updating older web applications that rely on AJAX, as it provides backward compatibility with legacy codebases

Pros

• It is also useful for understanding the evolution of web APIs and for scenarios where fine-grained control over HTTP requests (e
• Related to: javascript, ajax

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

jQuery Ajax

Developers should learn jQuery Ajax when working on legacy web projects or maintaining older codebases that rely on jQuery, as it was widely used for client-side scripting before modern JavaScript frameworks

Pros

• It's particularly useful for quick prototyping, simple dynamic updates, or when needing cross-browser compatibility without extensive configuration
• Related to: jquery, javascript

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. XMLHttpRequest is a tool while jQuery Ajax is a library. We picked XMLHttpRequest based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

XMLHttpRequest wins

Based on overall popularity. XMLHttpRequest is more widely used, but jQuery Ajax excels in its own space.