Dynamic

XSLT 1.0 vs XSLT 3.0

Developers should learn XSLT 1 meets developers should learn xslt 3. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

XSLT 1.0

Developers should learn XSLT 1

XSLT 1.0

Nice Pick

Developers should learn XSLT 1

Pros

  • +0 when working with legacy systems, XML-based data processing, or scenarios requiring cross-platform XML transformations, such as in publishing workflows or enterprise data integration
  • +Related to: xml, xslt-2.0

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

XSLT 3.0

Developers should learn XSLT 3

Pros

  • +0 when working with XML-based systems, such as in publishing, data integration, or web services, where efficient transformation of structured data is required
  • +Related to: xml, xslt-2.0

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use XSLT 1.0 if: You want 0 when working with legacy systems, xml-based data processing, or scenarios requiring cross-platform xml transformations, such as in publishing workflows or enterprise data integration and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use XSLT 3.0 if: You prioritize 0 when working with xml-based systems, such as in publishing, data integration, or web services, where efficient transformation of structured data is required over what XSLT 1.0 offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
XSLT 1.0 wins

Developers should learn XSLT 1

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev