Dynamic
XSLT 1.0 vs XSLT 3.0
Developers should learn XSLT 1 meets developers should learn xslt 3. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
XSLT 1.0
Developers should learn XSLT 1
XSLT 1.0
Nice PickDevelopers should learn XSLT 1
Pros
- +0 when working with legacy systems, XML-based data processing, or scenarios requiring cross-platform XML transformations, such as in publishing workflows or enterprise data integration
- +Related to: xml, xslt-2.0
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
XSLT 3.0
Developers should learn XSLT 3
Pros
- +0 when working with XML-based systems, such as in publishing, data integration, or web services, where efficient transformation of structured data is required
- +Related to: xml, xslt-2.0
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use XSLT 1.0 if: You want 0 when working with legacy systems, xml-based data processing, or scenarios requiring cross-platform xml transformations, such as in publishing workflows or enterprise data integration and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use XSLT 3.0 if: You prioritize 0 when working with xml-based systems, such as in publishing, data integration, or web services, where efficient transformation of structured data is required over what XSLT 1.0 offers.
🧊
The Bottom Line
XSLT 1.0 wins
Developers should learn XSLT 1
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev