Dynamic
Zapier vs Pipedream
The default choice meets the glue that holds your saas stack together, letting you automate workflows without drowning in api docs. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
Zapier
The default choice. Easy but expensive and limited.
Zapier
Nice PickThe default choice. Easy but expensive and limited.
Pros
- +Easy to use
- +Most integrations
- +Reliable
Cons
- -Very expensive
- -Limited logic
- -Slow
Pipedream
The glue that holds your SaaS stack together, letting you automate workflows without drowning in API docs.
Pros
- +Visual workflow builder with 1,000+ pre-built integrations
- +Instant HTTP endpoints for webhooks and serverless functions
- +Built-in observability with logs, triggers, and debugging tools
- +Free tier generous enough for prototyping and small projects
Cons
- -Complex workflows can become spaghetti code in the UI
- -Vendor lock-in risk as workflows are platform-specific
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Zapier is a automation while Pipedream is a hosting & deployment. We picked Zapier based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
🧊
The Bottom Line
Zapier wins
Based on overall popularity. Zapier is more widely used, but Pipedream excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev