Zipkin vs New Relic

Developers should use Zipkin when building or maintaining distributed systems, especially microservices, to monitor request flows and debug latency issues meets developers should use new relic when building or maintaining applications that require high availability, performance optimization, and proactive issue detection, such as in e-commerce, saas, or microservices architectures. Here's our take.

Zipkin

Nice Pick

Developers should use Zipkin when building or maintaining distributed systems, especially microservices, to monitor request flows and debug latency issues

Pros

• It is essential for identifying slow services, understanding dependencies between components, and optimizing performance in complex architectures
• Related to: distributed-tracing, microservices

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

New Relic

Developers should use New Relic when building or maintaining applications that require high availability, performance optimization, and proactive issue detection, such as in e-commerce, SaaS, or microservices architectures

Pros

• It is particularly valuable for teams adopting DevOps practices, as it integrates with CI/CD pipelines and provides actionable insights to reduce mean time to resolution (MTTR) and improve user experience through features like APM, infrastructure monitoring, and AI-powered alerts
• Related to: application-performance-monitoring, observability

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Zipkin is a tool while New Relic is a platform. We picked Zipkin based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Zipkin wins

Based on overall popularity. Zipkin is more widely used, but New Relic excels in its own space.