Zoom SDK vs Jitsi

Developers should use the Zoom SDK when building applications that require embedded video conferencing, such as telehealth apps, online education platforms, or enterprise collaboration tools, to leverage Zoom's reliable infrastructure without users needing the standalone Zoom app meets developers should learn jitsi when building privacy-focused, self-hosted communication solutions for applications like telehealth, remote education, or enterprise collaboration, as it avoids vendor lock-in and offers end-to-end encryption. Here's our take.

Zoom SDK

Nice Pick

Developers should use the Zoom SDK when building applications that require embedded video conferencing, such as telehealth apps, online education platforms, or enterprise collaboration tools, to leverage Zoom's reliable infrastructure without users needing the standalone Zoom app

Pros

• It's particularly valuable for creating branded or specialized communication experiences, like integrating meetings into custom CRM or project management software, where native Zoom features enhance user engagement and productivity
• Related to: video-conferencing, web-rtc

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Jitsi

Developers should learn Jitsi when building privacy-focused, self-hosted communication solutions for applications like telehealth, remote education, or enterprise collaboration, as it avoids vendor lock-in and offers end-to-end encryption

Pros

• It's ideal for projects needing customizable, scalable video conferencing integrated into web or mobile apps via its APIs and SDKs
• Related to: webrtc, video-conferencing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Zoom SDK is a library while Jitsi is a platform. We picked Zoom SDK based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Zoom SDK wins

Based on overall popularity. Zoom SDK is more widely used, but Jitsi excels in its own space.