Accessibility Testing vs General Usability Testing

Developers should learn and use accessibility testing to meet legal requirements (e meets developers should learn and use general usability testing during the design and development phases to create user-friendly products that meet real-world needs, reducing user frustration and increasing adoption rates. Here's our take.

Accessibility Testing

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use accessibility testing to meet legal requirements (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: web-accessibility, wcag-guidelines

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

General Usability Testing

Developers should learn and use General Usability Testing during the design and development phases to create user-friendly products that meet real-world needs, reducing user frustration and increasing adoption rates

Pros

• It is particularly valuable for web and mobile applications, e-commerce sites, and enterprise software, where poor usability can lead to high bounce rates, support costs, or user abandonment
• Related to: user-research, user-experience-design

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Accessibility Testing if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use General Usability Testing if: You prioritize it is particularly valuable for web and mobile applications, e-commerce sites, and enterprise software, where poor usability can lead to high bounce rates, support costs, or user abandonment over what Accessibility Testing offers.

The Bottom Line

Accessibility Testing wins

Developers should learn and use accessibility testing to meet legal requirements (e