Dynamic

Amazon SES vs Postmark

AWS's email cannon: powerful for bulk blasts, but good luck navigating the pricing maze meets the reliable workhorse for transactional emails—no fluff, just emails that actually land in inboxes. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Postmark

The reliable workhorse for transactional emails—no fluff, just emails that actually land in inboxes.

Amazon SES

AWS's email cannon: powerful for bulk blasts, but good luck navigating the pricing maze.

Pros

  • +Highly scalable and reliable for sending millions of emails
  • +Integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like S3 and Lambda
  • +Built-in bounce handling and feedback loops improve deliverability

Cons

  • -Complex pricing structure with hidden costs for attachments and data transfer
  • -Steep learning curve for beginners, especially with AWS console navigation

Postmark

Nice Pick

The reliable workhorse for transactional emails—no fluff, just emails that actually land in inboxes.

Pros

  • +Great deliverability
  • +Fast
  • +Mature
  • +Good templates
  • +Exceptional deliverability with dedicated IPs and spam avoidance
  • +Detailed analytics and real-time webhooks for tracking
  • +Simple, clean API that developers love
  • +Fast and reliable for time-sensitive emails like password resets

Cons

  • -Transactional only
  • -Less flexible
  • -Older API
  • -Pricing can be steep for high-volume senders
  • -Limited marketing email features compared to all-in-one platforms

The Verdict

Use Postmark if: You want great deliverability and can live with transactional only.

Use Amazon SES if: You prioritize highly scalable and reliable for sending millions of emails over what Postmark offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Postmark wins

The reliable workhorse for transactional emails—no fluff, just emails that actually land in inboxes.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev