Amazon SES vs Postmark
AWS's email cannon: powerful for bulk blasts, but good luck navigating the pricing maze meets the reliable workhorse for transactional emails—no fluff, just emails that actually land in inboxes. Here's our take.
Postmark
The reliable workhorse for transactional emails—no fluff, just emails that actually land in inboxes.
Amazon SES
AWS's email cannon: powerful for bulk blasts, but good luck navigating the pricing maze.
Pros
- +Highly scalable and reliable for sending millions of emails
- +Integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like S3 and Lambda
- +Built-in bounce handling and feedback loops improve deliverability
Cons
- -Complex pricing structure with hidden costs for attachments and data transfer
- -Steep learning curve for beginners, especially with AWS console navigation
Postmark
Nice PickThe reliable workhorse for transactional emails—no fluff, just emails that actually land in inboxes.
Pros
- +Great deliverability
- +Fast
- +Mature
- +Good templates
- +Exceptional deliverability with dedicated IPs and spam avoidance
- +Detailed analytics and real-time webhooks for tracking
- +Simple, clean API that developers love
- +Fast and reliable for time-sensitive emails like password resets
Cons
- -Transactional only
- -Less flexible
- -Older API
- -Pricing can be steep for high-volume senders
- -Limited marketing email features compared to all-in-one platforms
The Verdict
Use Postmark if: You want great deliverability and can live with transactional only.
Use Amazon SES if: You prioritize highly scalable and reliable for sending millions of emails over what Postmark offers.
The reliable workhorse for transactional emails—no fluff, just emails that actually land in inboxes.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev