Babel vs Custom Polyfills
Developers should use Babel when building web applications that need to support older browsers like Internet Explorer or when using cutting-edge JavaScript features not yet universally supported meets developers should create or use custom polyfills when building web applications that must run on older browsers (e. Here's our take.
Babel
Developers should use Babel when building web applications that need to support older browsers like Internet Explorer or when using cutting-edge JavaScript features not yet universally supported
Babel
Nice PickDevelopers should use Babel when building web applications that need to support older browsers like Internet Explorer or when using cutting-edge JavaScript features not yet universally supported
Pros
- +It is essential in modern front-end development workflows, especially with frameworks like React, to transpile JSX and ES6+ syntax into ES5 for production deployment
- +Related to: javascript, es6
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Custom Polyfills
Developers should create or use custom polyfills when building web applications that must run on older browsers (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: javascript, es6
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Babel is a tool while Custom Polyfills is a concept. We picked Babel based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. Babel is more widely used, but Custom Polyfills excels in its own space.
Related Comparisons
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev