Backend For Frontend vs API Gateway
Developers should use BFF when building complex applications with multiple frontends (e meets developers should use an api gateway when building microservices architectures or exposing apis to external clients, as it centralizes cross-cutting concerns like authentication, logging, and throttling. Here's our take.
Backend For Frontend
Developers should use BFF when building complex applications with multiple frontends (e
Backend For Frontend
Nice PickDevelopers should use BFF when building complex applications with multiple frontends (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: microservices, api-gateway
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
API Gateway
Developers should use an API Gateway when building microservices architectures or exposing APIs to external clients, as it centralizes cross-cutting concerns like authentication, logging, and throttling
Pros
- +It's essential for managing API traffic efficiently, improving security by enforcing policies, and enabling features like versioning and monetization in enterprise applications
- +Related to: microservices, rest-api
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Backend For Frontend is a methodology while API Gateway is a platform. We picked Backend For Frontend based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. Backend For Frontend is more widely used, but API Gateway excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev