Dynamic

Backend For Frontend vs API Gateway

Developers should use BFF when building complex applications with multiple frontends (e meets developers should use an api gateway when building microservices architectures or exposing apis to external clients, as it centralizes cross-cutting concerns like authentication, logging, and throttling. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Backend For Frontend

Developers should use BFF when building complex applications with multiple frontends (e

Backend For Frontend

Nice Pick

Developers should use BFF when building complex applications with multiple frontends (e

Pros

  • +g
  • +Related to: microservices, api-gateway

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

API Gateway

Developers should use an API Gateway when building microservices architectures or exposing APIs to external clients, as it centralizes cross-cutting concerns like authentication, logging, and throttling

Pros

  • +It's essential for managing API traffic efficiently, improving security by enforcing policies, and enabling features like versioning and monetization in enterprise applications
  • +Related to: microservices, rest-api

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Backend For Frontend is a methodology while API Gateway is a platform. We picked Backend For Frontend based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Backend For Frontend wins

Based on overall popularity. Backend For Frontend is more widely used, but API Gateway excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev