C++/WinRT vs Qt
Developers should learn C++/WinRT when building native Windows applications (e meets developers should learn qt when building cross-platform desktop applications, embedded systems, or mobile apps that require a consistent ui across windows, macos, linux, android, and ios. Here's our take.
C++/WinRT
Developers should learn C++/WinRT when building native Windows applications (e
C++/WinRT
Nice PickDevelopers should learn C++/WinRT when building native Windows applications (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: c-plus-plus, windows-runtime
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Qt
Developers should learn Qt when building cross-platform desktop applications, embedded systems, or mobile apps that require a consistent UI across Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS
Pros
- +It is particularly valuable for projects needing high performance, native integration, and extensive widget libraries, such as in automotive, medical devices, or industrial automation software
- +Related to: c-plus-plus, qml
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. C++/WinRT is a library while Qt is a framework. We picked C++/WinRT based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. C++/WinRT is more widely used, but Qt excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev