Dynamic

C++/WinRT vs Qt

Developers should learn C++/WinRT when building native Windows applications (e meets developers should learn qt when building cross-platform desktop applications, embedded systems, or mobile apps that require a consistent ui across windows, macos, linux, android, and ios. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

C++/WinRT

Developers should learn C++/WinRT when building native Windows applications (e

C++/WinRT

Nice Pick

Developers should learn C++/WinRT when building native Windows applications (e

Pros

  • +g
  • +Related to: c-plus-plus, windows-runtime

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Qt

Developers should learn Qt when building cross-platform desktop applications, embedded systems, or mobile apps that require a consistent UI across Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS

Pros

  • +It is particularly valuable for projects needing high performance, native integration, and extensive widget libraries, such as in automotive, medical devices, or industrial automation software
  • +Related to: c-plus-plus, qml

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. C++/WinRT is a library while Qt is a framework. We picked C++/WinRT based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
C++/WinRT wins

Based on overall popularity. C++/WinRT is more widely used, but Qt excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev