Custom Communication Solutions vs GraphQL

Developers should learn and use Custom Communication Solutions when standard communication tools (e meets developers should learn graphql when building modern web or mobile applications that require flexible, efficient data fetching, such as in complex frontend-backend integrations or microservices architectures. Here's our take.

Custom Communication Solutions

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use Custom Communication Solutions when standard communication tools (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: websockets, message-queues

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

GraphQL

Developers should learn GraphQL when building modern web or mobile applications that require flexible, efficient data fetching, such as in complex frontend-backend integrations or microservices architectures

Pros

• It's particularly useful for scenarios where clients need to avoid multiple round-trips to servers or when APIs must evolve without breaking existing queries
• Related to: apollo-client, relay

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Custom Communication Solutions is a concept while GraphQL is a tool. We picked Custom Communication Solutions based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Custom Communication Solutions wins

Based on overall popularity. Custom Communication Solutions is more widely used, but GraphQL excels in its own space.