Dynamic

Cypress vs Selenium

End-to-end testing that doesn't make you want to end it all meets the og web automation tool that makes you feel like a wizard, until you're debugging flaky tests at 2 am. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Cypress

End-to-end testing that doesn't make you want to end it all. Finally, a browser automation tool that actually works.

Cypress

Nice Pick

End-to-end testing that doesn't make you want to end it all. Finally, a browser automation tool that actually works.

Pros

  • +Automatic waiting eliminates flaky timeouts
  • +Time-travel debugging lets you step through test failures
  • +Runs directly in the browser for real-world testing
  • +Built-in dashboard for test results and CI integration

Cons

  • -Limited support for cross-browser testing (mainly Chrome/Firefox)
  • -Can't run multiple tabs or windows simultaneously

Selenium

The OG web automation tool that makes you feel like a wizard, until you're debugging flaky tests at 2 AM.

Pros

  • +Supports multiple programming languages (Java, Python, C#, JavaScript) for flexible test scripting
  • +Selenium WebDriver provides robust browser automation across Chrome, Firefox, and others
  • +Selenium Grid enables parallel test execution for faster feedback loops

Cons

  • -Tests can be flaky and require significant maintenance due to dynamic web elements
  • -Setup and configuration for advanced features like Grid can be complex and time-consuming

The Verdict

Use Cypress if: You want automatic waiting eliminates flaky timeouts and can live with limited support for cross-browser testing (mainly chrome/firefox).

Use Selenium if: You prioritize supports multiple programming languages (java, python, c#, javascript) for flexible test scripting over what Cypress offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Cypress wins

End-to-end testing that doesn't make you want to end it all. Finally, a browser automation tool that actually works.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev