Dynamic

Firebase vs Firestore

Google's all-in-one meets google's real-time database that makes syncing feel like magic, until you hit the query limits. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Firebase

Google's all-in-one. Fast to start, painful to leave.

Firebase

Nice Pick

Google's all-in-one. Fast to start, painful to leave.

Pros

  • +Mature ecosystem
  • +Great docs
  • +Fast prototyping
  • +Google scale

Cons

  • -Vendor lock-in
  • -NoSQL limits
  • -Pricing surprises
  • -Proprietary

Firestore

Google's real-time database that makes syncing feel like magic, until you hit the query limits.

Pros

  • +Real-time data synchronization out of the box
  • +Offline support for mobile and web apps
  • +Automatic scaling with minimal operational overhead
  • +Seamless integration with Firebase and Google Cloud services

Cons

  • -Query limitations can be restrictive for complex data structures
  • -Costs can escalate quickly with high read/write volumes

The Verdict

Use Firebase if: You want mature ecosystem and can live with vendor lock-in.

Use Firestore if: You prioritize real-time data synchronization out of the box over what Firebase offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Firebase wins

Google's all-in-one. Fast to start, painful to leave.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev