GitLab CI/CD vs CircleCI
The all-in-one DevOps Swiss Army knife that makes you wonder why you ever used separate tools meets the ci/cd platform that's so reliable, you'll forget it's there until it breaks. Here's our take.
GitLab CI/CD
The all-in-one DevOps Swiss Army knife that makes you wonder why you ever used separate tools.
GitLab CI/CD
Nice PickThe all-in-one DevOps Swiss Army knife that makes you wonder why you ever used separate tools.
Pros
- +Tight integration with GitLab repos means no third-party config sync headaches
- +.gitlab-ci.yml is simple YAML that even your PM could almost understand
- +Built-in container registry and Kubernetes integration cut deployment friction
- +Auto DevOps feature can bootstrap projects with sensible defaults
Cons
- -Can feel bloated if you just want basic CI without the GitLab ecosystem baggage
- -Runner management and scaling is its own part-time job for larger teams
CircleCI
The CI/CD platform that's so reliable, you'll forget it's there until it breaks.
Pros
- +Orbs make reusing configs across projects a breeze
- +Native Docker support for consistent build environments
- +Parallel job execution speeds up your pipelines
- +Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and Bitbucket
Cons
- -Pricing can get steep for teams with heavy usage
- -YAML configs can become unwieldy for complex workflows
The Verdict
Use GitLab CI/CD if: You want tight integration with gitlab repos means no third-party config sync headaches and can live with can feel bloated if you just want basic ci without the gitlab ecosystem baggage.
Use CircleCI if: You prioritize orbs make reusing configs across projects a breeze over what GitLab CI/CD offers.
The all-in-one DevOps Swiss Army knife that makes you wonder why you ever used separate tools.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev