Dynamic

REST vs GraphQL

Developers should learn REST when building web APIs or microservices, as it provides a standardized, scalable approach for client-server communication over HTTP meets developers should learn graphql when building modern web or mobile applications that require flexible, efficient data fetching, such as in complex frontend-backend integrations or microservices architectures. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

REST

Developers should learn REST when building web APIs or microservices, as it provides a standardized, scalable approach for client-server communication over HTTP

REST

Nice Pick

Developers should learn REST when building web APIs or microservices, as it provides a standardized, scalable approach for client-server communication over HTTP

Pros

  • +It is widely used in modern web development, mobile app backends, and cloud services due to its simplicity, statelessness, and compatibility with existing web infrastructure
  • +Related to: http, api-design

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

GraphQL

Developers should learn GraphQL when building modern web or mobile applications that require flexible, efficient data fetching, such as in complex frontend-backend integrations or microservices architectures

Pros

  • +It's particularly useful for scenarios where clients need to avoid multiple round-trips to servers or when APIs must evolve without breaking existing queries
  • +Related to: apollo-client, relay

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. REST is a concept while GraphQL is a tool. We picked REST based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
REST wins

Based on overall popularity. REST is more widely used, but GraphQL excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev