Jakarta EE vs Micronaut

Developers should learn Jakarta EE when building large-scale, distributed enterprise applications that require robustness, security, and integration with legacy systems, such as in banking, e-commerce, or government sectors meets developers should learn micronaut when building high-performance, low-latency microservices or serverless functions in java, kotlin, or groovy, especially for cloud deployments where fast startup and minimal resource usage are critical. Here's our take.

Jakarta EE

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Jakarta EE when building large-scale, distributed enterprise applications that require robustness, security, and integration with legacy systems, such as in banking, e-commerce, or government sectors

Pros

• It is particularly useful for projects needing standardized APIs for persistence, messaging, and web services, and for teams transitioning to cloud-native development with support for containers and microservices
• Related to: java, microservices

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Micronaut

Developers should learn Micronaut when building high-performance, low-latency microservices or serverless functions in Java, Kotlin, or Groovy, especially for cloud deployments where fast startup and minimal resource usage are critical

Pros

• It's particularly useful in scenarios like IoT, real-time data processing, or scalable backend services due to its efficient AOT compilation and built-in support for reactive programming
• Related to: java, kotlin

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Jakarta EE is a platform while Micronaut is a framework. We picked Jakarta EE based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Jakarta EE wins

Based on overall popularity. Jakarta EE is more widely used, but Micronaut excels in its own space.